NRA files a new lawsuit against Oliver North, attempting to remove him from the Board – but hides most facts from public view.
Court rules against North’s request for indemnification
The court determines that case involves “dry legal dispute” and rules against North
NRA board member states his concerns about North.
North demands review of exorbitant attorneys’ fees paid to the Brewer firm.
North blows whistle on NRA’s financial management and tries to initiate internal investigation.
North responds to the NRA’s motion to dismiss.
NRA minutes discuss issues with the Brewer firm contract and resolve to indemnify
Filing Summary This filing is the NRA’s memorandum of law in support of its motion to dismiss Oliver North’s counterclaims and affirmative defenses. This filing also makes arguments for why the court should declare that North has no right to indemnification from the NRA. Key Points The NRA presents its interpretation of the NRA Bylaws. […]
The NRA responds to North’s counterclaims.