Court rules against the NRA and requires Ackerman to comply with the AG’s subpoena without giving the NRA an opportunity to preview and review Ackerman’s production.

Filing Summary This is a letter from the OAG in response to the NRA’s purported expert affirmation from Arthur Miller. The OAG argues that Miller’s affirmation should be disregarded as improper legal opinion. Key Points The OAG argues that the NRA’s submission of an expert affirmation from Arthur Miller is “an untimely, unauthorized, post-argument sur-reply” […]

Filing Summary Arthur Miller, a law professor at New York University, makes legal arguments in support of the NRA’s opposition to the OAG. He argues that the NRA’s relationship with Ackerman, as alleged by the NRA, is so close as to create attorney-client privilege with respect to communications between the NRA and Ackerman. The existence […]